Money for Ukraine tops G7 agenda; food security top priority

Seven financial leaders are likely to agree on Thursday and Friday on around $15 billion to help Ukraine pay its bills in coming months, but surging inflation, climate change, supply chains and the impending food crisis are also on the agenda

Finance ministers and central bank governors of the United States, Japan, Canada, Britain, Germany, France and Italy – the G7 – are holding talks as Ukraine, invaded by Russia on Feb. 24, is struggling to fend off the attack and is running out of cash.

“We have to secure the liquidity of the Ukrainian state,” German Finance Minister Christian Lindner, whose country holds the rotating presidency of the group, told reporters on entering the talks. Lindner said he was optimistic the group would be able to provide the funding Ukraine will need over coming months.

“The war in Ukraine … also entails additional risks for the development of the world economy … inflation, but also the lack of recovery after the pandemic. Therefore, we will have to discuss what we can do together in our respective areas of responsibility to avoid stagflation scenarios,” Lindner said.

“The war is a game-changer for Western powers, forcing them to rethink decades-old relations with Russia in energy, food and global supply alliances“

The war is a game-changer for Western powers, forcing them to rethink decades-old relations with Russia not only in terms of security, but also in energy, food and global supply alliances from microchips to rare earths.

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said she was “getting more optimistic” about a swift funding deal for Ukraine that will provide about $5 billion a month for the next three months and allow Kyiv to avoid “terrible, terrible damage” from hyperinflation.

Ukraine estimates it needs such amounts to keep public employees’ salaries paid and the administration working despite the daily destruction wrought by Russia.

More broadly, the G7 policymakers are also wrestling with the question of how to contain inflation and increase sanctions pressure on Russia without causing recession.

More and more officials bring up the term “stagflation” – the dreaded 1970s combination of persistent price increases coupled with economic stagnation.

“Ukraine is overshadowing these meetings. But there are other issues that must be discussed,” a G7 official, who asked not to be named, said, adding that debt, international taxation, climate change and global health were all up for debate.

SHORT-TERM CASH, LONG-TERM REBUILDING

The European Commission offered on Wednesday to provide up to 9 billion euros ($9.44 billion) in loans to Ukraine, financed from EU borrowing guaranteed by EU governments, to cover Kyiv’s needs until the end of June.

Japan on Thursday pledged to double its aid for Ukraine to $600 million to help it cover its near-term needs.

The EU executive also proposed to set up a fund of unspecified size of grants and loans for Ukraine, possibly jointly borrowed by the EU, to pay for its post-war reconstruction.

Some economists estimate such a project would require between 500 billion euros and 2 trillion euros ($524 billion to $2.09 trillion), with estimates frequently changing depending on the length of the conflict and the scope of destruction.

With sums of such magnitude, the EU is considering not only a new joint borrowing project, modelled on the pandemic recovery fund, but also seizing the now frozen Russian assets in the EU, as sources of financing.

Some countries like Germany, however, say that the idea, though politically interesting, would be on shaky legal grounds.

U.S. officials emphasise it is too soon to map out financing for a massive rebuilding plan for Ukraine and Washington wants the discussions to focus on Kyiv’s immediate budget needs over the next three months.

“We’re focused more on the budget needs of Ukraine in the next three months than about reconstruction, Marshall Plans and asset confiscation,” a U.S. Treasury official said.